Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Woman of the Year


Okay, so it's not the Nobel prize but still, you have to question Glamour magazine's logic. Why name Victoria Beckham 'Woman of the Year'? What exactly has she done for our gender? To me it says, 'why worry about poverty, world peace and pestilence, when you can wear hotpants over the age of 30?'. It's not the advice I'd want to pass on to the next generation.

So let's all follow the shining example set by Glamour's Woman of the Year. Starve yourself, cut your hair, drag your family across the world to feed your need for fame, parade yourself in expensive fashion but never have any style and, most of all tolerate, your philandering husband because you're not worth it. Glamour, you're never getting any money from my pocket again.

Labels:

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Holy cow batman! How could they, thats like dragging the whole feminist movement back 50 years.
They couldn't choose someone else, like someone with a brain, hell I would be glad if they choose someone with just a half brain.
And Vicky was my wife I to would search for comfort with someone else than her.

8:45 am  
Blogger ~Pees With A Fist Sitting Down said...

Bravo! Bravo! Well said, Lucky. (I saw somewhere where someone said her blood type is O-Tacky) Excellent.

2:45 pm  
Blogger T :) said...

Ha! I thought giving this harpie a Woman of the year award would bring you back from your overly long break! Welcome back.

Now, what's all this about Paris Hilton getting released after 5 days for 'medical reasons'???

More please Lucky...

3:32 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Woman... www.sayyourword.com

9:25 pm  
Blogger Rocky (Racquel) said...

Glamour used to be a good mag until it turned into another 'Elle' or 'Cosmopolitan'.

For goodness sakes, when will somebody who actually contributes something worthwhile to society be recognized?

BTW, MISS YOU LUCKY!!!

2:57 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home

I heart FeedBurner